Bengals to host Dalton Risner on a FA visit

[RunKijanaRun]

So Cordell Volson might be out for the year?

Call Risner back and offer to pay for a first class flight

[Tomcat]

(3 hours ago)RunKijanaRun Wrote: So Cordell Volson might be out for the year?

Call Risner back and offer to pay for a first class flight

https://www.cincyjungle.com/cincinnati-bengals-news/172664/cordell-volson-injury-surgery

[NUGDUKWE]

(3 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: I fixed it for you

Trust me I know. If you look inside yourself I think you know as well.

[cinci4life]

(3 hours ago)RunKijanaRun Wrote: So Cordell Volson might be out for the year?

Call Risner back and offer to pay for a first class flight

Yep.

Bengals G Cordell Volson Out For Season

[NUGDUKWE]

(3 hours ago)RunKijanaRun Wrote: So Cordell Volson might be out for the year?

Call Risner back and offer to pay for a first class flight

Yes I just saw that as well. Need to call him back and meet his asking price today. If we do sign him he could legitimately be asked to start week 1. 

[*rfaulk34*]

(4 hours ago)Stewy Wrote: You need to look at Joe Goodberry's snap by snap break down of PS GM1.  Patrick looked awful play after play.  He was pushed back, pushed around, three separate times he was faked by a DL that went around him like he was standing still.  Go watch that video.  He literally looked horrid on all but 1-2 plays.

No he wasn't. Not.even.close.

If we consider "good" to be him keeping his man from getting a pressure or sack on pass sets and keeping his man from being in on the tackle on run plays, out of 16 snaps, he was "good" on 12 of them. 

If Goodberry is that wrong about something so easy to see and disprove, maybe you shouldn't be listening to Goodberry. This has to be one of the biggest loads of BS i've seen recently. 

[Luvnit2]

Interesting same people who thought Volson should be cut, now thing we are in dire need because hegot hurt and is done for the year?

I want Risner and had Volson on my cut list in the one thread with no Risner. Of course, I have us cutting Ford as well without Risner.

[WeezyBengal]

(3 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: Interesting same people who thought Volson should be cut, now thing we are in dire need because hegot hurt and is done for the year?

I want Risner and had Volson on my cut list in the one thread with no Risner. Of course, I have us cutting Ford as well without Risner.

Who wanted Volson cut? 

No one wants him to be the starter. But he was an OK depth option. 

[Luvnit2]

(3 hours ago)rfaulk34 Wrote: No he wasn't. Not.even.close.

If we consider "good" to be him keeping his man from getting a pressure or sack on pass sets and keeping his man from being in on the tackle on run plays, out of 16 snaps, he was "good" on 12 of them. 

If Goodberry is that wrong about something so easy to see and disprove, maybe you shouldn't be listening to Goodberry. This has to be one of the biggest loads of BS i've seen recently. 

Yes, I went back today and rewatched our OL. McLaughlin , Patrick and Coker were 3 I fouced on. All 3 did better than I thought watching them live. Rivers had some bad plays, but he also had some very good RB plays. Rivers gave up the sack, but it was on Browning anda coverage sack in my opinion.

I was actually encouraged watching our back ups. Based on this I think Bengals have to keep McLaughlin on the 53, may mean Lee is odd man out ot the keep 3 centers and work with one of two to backup guard position.

[Luvnit2]

(3 hours ago)WeezyBengal Wrote: Who wanted Volson cut? 

No one wants him to be the starter. But he was an OK depth option. 

Trust me, some have clamoring for Volson to be cut since last year. He also got a huge raise due to PT the last 3 years so that made he a bigger cut candidate in the minds of many.

[J24]

(3 hours ago)WeezyBengal Wrote: Who wanted Volson cut? 

No one wants him to be the starter. But he was an OK depth option. 

I wanted to cut him in spring and replace him with Teven Jenkins (who signed  with the Browns); dude isn’t  a good NFL player.

[Luvnit2]

(3 hours ago)J24 Wrote: I wanted to cut him in spring and replace him with Teven Jenkins (who signed  with the Browns); dude isn’t  a good NFL player.

TY and not knocking your opinion. I like him a lot more at 900K than I did at over 3 million for 2025 do to the raise the NFL gave him for PT over last 3 years.

[Sled21]

(7 hours ago)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: This has to be exhausting for you.

Dealing with some of the nonsense on here, it's not exhausting as much as exacerbating.

[RunKijanaRun]

(3 hours ago)Sled21 Wrote: Dealing with some of the nonsense on here, it's not exhausting as much as exacerbating.

Exacerbating what?

[Sled21]

(3 hours ago)Luvnit2 Wrote: Yes, I went back today and rewatched our OL. McLaughlin , Patrick and Coker were 3 I fouced on. All 3 did better than I thought watching them live. Rivers had some bad plays, but he also had some very good RB plays. Rivers gave up the sack, but it was on Browning anda coverage sack in my opinion.

I was actually encouraged watching our back ups. Based on this I think Bengals have to keep McLaughlin on the 53, may mean Lee is odd man out ot the keep 3 centers and work with one of two to backup guard position.

According to Bengals.com, Patrick graded very high against Washington in the run game. I don't have PFF so I can't see the number. But he is supposed to be better in pass protection than the run, is he not?

[*Nate (formerly eliminate08)*]

(3 hours ago)cinci4life Wrote: Yep.

Bengals G Cordell Volson Out For Season

Whoa, have to bring back Risner now and give him a better deal. As much as some on here hated Volson I thought he could be decent depth.

(3 hours ago)rfaulk34 Wrote: No he wasn't. Not.even.close.

If we consider "good" to be him keeping his man from getting a pressure or sack on pass sets and keeping his man from being in on the tackle on run plays, out of 16 snaps, he was "good" on 12 of them. 

If Goodberry is that wrong about something so easy to see and disprove, maybe you shouldn't be listening to Goodberry. This has to be one of the biggest loads of BS i've seen recently. 

Thanks, I saw the same thing you saw so wasn't understanding what Goodberry and Stewy saw there. Patrick may not be great, but he is good 
depth and good competition if he can stay healthy. Problem is he cannot stay healthy and with the injuries we have to bring in Risner at the very 
least especially with Volson out the entire year.

[SladeX]

Love our proactive FO. Don’t you?

[*rfaulk34*]

(3 hours ago)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Who cares about Game 1? Patrick had just returned to camp after being dinged up. Game 2 is the more relevant data.

Same criteria as before. 

He played 21 snaps and was positive on 17 of them. 

He took his guy to the ground on the 2nd Burrow sack and that was when he first grabbed his shoulder/chest. Stayed in one more snap before grabbing it again and coming out. 

That's 75% positive PS1 
and 81% positive PS2

You can argue how he "looked" on some of the reps, but if his guy didn't cause a pressure or sack, or wasn't in on the tackle on run reps, that's not negative. 

[*rfaulk34*]

(3 hours ago)WeezyBengal Wrote: Who wanted Volson cut? 

No one wants him to be the starter. But he was an OK depth option. 

Ehhhhhhhh. Not so much, for me at least. 

He's an ok depth option if that's all he ever is. Once he gets in, he's a "starter" (for however long that is) and it's the same ole Volson. 

I got no probs with him being cut. 

[*rfaulk34*]

(2 hours ago)RunKijanaRun Wrote: Exacerbating what?