4 hours ago
(6 hours ago)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Who cares about Game 1? Patrick had just returned to camp after being dinged up. Game 2 is the more relevant data.
Same criteria as before.
He played 21 snaps and was positive on 17 of them.
He took his guy to the ground on the 2nd Burrow sack and that was when he first grabbed his shoulder/chest. Stayed in one more snap before grabbing it again and coming out.
That's 75% positive PS1
and 81% positive PS2
You can argue how he "looked" on some of the reps, but if his guy didn't cause a pressure or sack, or wasn't in on the tackle on run reps, that's not negative.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"Hope is not a strategy"
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
