Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Welcome Shamar Stewart
But really.....

Why are people so concerned with football?

"There's golf to be played and tennis to be served up and other things to be done out there besides worrying about a silly football game."
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(1 hour ago)Whatever Wrote: RAS is generally going to be lower with a pocket QB, to be fair.  

Of course just trying to lighten the mood a little. I mean he still has time to develope into a serviceable QB…

One thing I do like about Stewart is that everyone says he plays hard. That’s important and paired with his natural talent it really makes me think they may have something here.

I do think he’s Treys replacement starting next season.
If they do take a G and a S today then I think both will have a much greater chance of starting then Stewart will. I can see him being a rotational piece to start the season but the guard or safety should be able to beat out the guys they have now in TC.
Reply/Quote
(Today, 12:35 AM)tBengal Wrote: Sounds like he can get into the backfield, it’s just that he can’t finish. Maybe he can chase the QB into Hendrickson.

That'd be quite the feat if we trade him to Detroit or something. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(1 hour ago)Whatever Wrote: So, the RAS scores for the 1st round picks in the Taylor era are...

Jonah Williams-5.48
Joe Burrow -6.39
Ja'Marr Chase -9.81
Dax Hill-9.03
Myles Murphy -9.52
Amarius Mims -9.59
Shemar Stewart-10.00

I think everyone can agree that Chase was a hit.  Mims, based on his rookie season, is trending that way.

Dax is a tough one to handicap because his development has been stunted by injury and position changes, but he did look good once they moved him to outside CB last year.

Murphy is the only real guy I can say is a high RAS disappointing that doesn't have mitigating factors.  

Teams value RAS because the average player on an NFL roster has a 7.16 RAS, with the average starter over 8.

Take Jonah, for example.  He was as technically sound and "productive" as you could get out of college.  He was mediocre in the pro's because he just didn't have the traits to match up with more athletic edge rushers.

This is a good post. Thanks for that. But it is not either or. Take the guys who have both production AND the traits. 

All the guys on that list were productive, even Mims in limited snaps. Murphy was the least productive & had trouble finishing. 

Just for fun: RAS: 

Zabel: 9.49
Jackson: 9.72
J. Campbell: 9.95
Emmanwori: 10.00
Starks: 5.49
Barron: 9.00
Johnson: n/a
Harmon: n/a

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/apr/24/dave-boling-north-dakota-state-guard-grey-zabel-a-/

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25166807-2025-nfl-draft-big-board-br-nfl-scouting-depts-post-combine-rankings

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-combine-top-ras-results-by-position-2025/
Reply/Quote
(59 minutes ago)Clark W Griswold Wrote: Of course just trying to lighten the mood a little.  I mean he still has time to develope into a serviceable QB…

One thing I do like about Stewart is that everyone says he plays hard. That’s important and paired with his natural talent it really makes me think they may have something here.

I do think he’s Treys replacement starting next season.
If they do take a G and a S today then I think both will have a much greater chance of starting then Stewart will. I can see him being a rotational piece to start the season but the guard or safety should be able to beat out the guys they have now in TC.

If there is a positive straw to grasp at, this is definitely one of them. 
“Don't give up. Don't ever give up.” - Jimmy V

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(41 minutes ago)Millhouse Wrote: If there is a positive straw to grasp at, this is definitely one of them. 

Well, when you mainly hire a new defensive staff because you need them to make chicken salad from chicken shit, it's only logical that your next move is to order another giant sack of chicken shit, right?
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(41 minutes ago)Millhouse Wrote: If there is a positive straw to grasp at, this is definitely one of them. 

Murphy plays hard, too. 
Reply/Quote
Seems many around here didn't want Booker because he wasn't Athletic enough despite dominating on the field. Now we're hating Stew for the opposite.

The following list contains former Bengal Great Wyatt Hubert:

Will McDonald (13)
Cade Hall (0)
Patrick Johnson (0)
Patrick Jones II (12)
Ochaun Mathis (0)
Leighton McCarthy (0)
Tarron Jackson (1)
Wyatt Hubert (1)
Isaiah Thomas (1)
Durrell Johnson (0)

Does anyone know what it is?

2020 NCAA Sack leaders (CAREER NFL Sacks)
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote
(53 minutes ago)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: This is a good post. Thanks for that. But it is not either or. Take the guys who have both production AND the traits. 

All the guys on that list were productive, even Mims in limited snaps. Murphy was the least productive & had trouble finishing. 

Just for fun: RAS: 

Zabel: 9.49
Jackson: 9.72
J. Campbell: 9.95
Emmanwori: 10.00
Starks: 5.49
Barron: 9.00
Johnson: n/a
Harmon: n/a

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2025/apr/24/dave-boling-north-dakota-state-guard-grey-zabel-a-/

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25166807-2025-nfl-draft-big-board-br-nfl-scouting-depts-post-combine-rankings

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl-combine-top-ras-results-by-position-2025/

Lots of guys skip agility drills, but Zabel and Jackson literally refused to run, so I take those scores with a massive grain of salt.   Campbell didn't do bench or vert jump, so he's also incomplete, but had a legit excuse with the injury.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: *bfine32*, 30 Guest(s)