04-11-2017, 09:20 PM
(04-11-2017, 07:52 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: And I am talking about people who are getting some of the best doctors and physical therapists in the world. The same people who got Terrell Suggs back on the field 5 months after he tore his achilles. Who had Leon Hall backpedaling and running 4 months after his achilles tear. The people that had Rob Gronkowski in the WWE ring 4 months after back surgery.
When you have millions of dollars, the best doctors and rehab specialists in the world, and you don't have to work 9-to-5 and then fit some rehab sessions in here and there, your recovery time isn't the same as Joe Fan.
And from the beginning, I've stated surgery is individualized to each patient every case which means Joe Fan doesn't necessarily wait 2-3 months and NFL players don't automatically have surgery right away. It's almost always best to avoid surgery if possible.
It's real easy for you to prove Eifert's injury was mismanaged. Just tell me was his diagnosis was?
If everything you wrote above about recovery is true, why wasn't Eifert ready 3 months after surgery like they reported?
Help me out with one more thing. If Hobson is right and Eifert tore a ligament in his ankle and it was a grade III ankle sprain of the ATFL like I surmised 11 months ago and surgery isn't clearly better than not having surgery and Eifert saw a foot and ankle specialist who didn't do surgery immediately which as I showed you is the standard of care for this type of injury, what is it that you think was mismanaged? Even though evidence indicates surgery isn't a superior treatment option, they should do surgery anyways despite the evidence? That type of thinking is why teams inappropriately used antibiotics for viral infections which contributed to increased rates of MRSA infections among their players. That's what happens when you ignore evidence.
