Yesterday, 12:32 PM
(Yesterday, 11:48 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: No, this is not correct. The Bengals can tell the team where they are at with Trey (they have agreed on the money portion) so they know what it will take. Trey is under contract for 2025, that is what the team is buying knowing they will meet his demands.
The other team can't speak to Trey or his agent prior to the trade unless the Bengals allow it. I don't see the Bengals allowing it to happen because once they do, then their offer becomes public knowledge.
Where they are at in negotiations with the Bengals is moot. The team that would trade for Trey inherits the rest of his contract, not the last offer. For Trey, that is one year at 16 million. He's obviously not going to play for that, so they need to have a deal with him or risk them trading a pick or player away for a guy who won't play for them. So yes, they have to have an agreement that Trey will sign. And the Bengals already gave Trey permission to seek a trade.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)