Yesterday, 03:04 PM
(Yesterday, 02:59 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Then you can't say he should have taken it.
They also "reportedly" offered Chase a big deal last offseason, but the "guaranteed" money didn't actually become guaranteed until four years later. The exact details are the only things that actually matter, Nate.
Michael Vick signed a "5yr/$80m" deal with the Eagles in 2011. He never even saw half of that. In 2013 he was on a 1yr/$7.5m deal. DETAILS MATTER.
The Bengals always "reportedly" offer FAs who leave a "fair" deal and then years later we find out it wasn't even CLOSE to competitive to the other offers. We saw it with Housh, we saw it with JJo, we saw it with Marvin Jones, we saw it with Whit. Yet somehow here you are again just believing the line.
Good points as usual. All I know is the deals for Ja'Marr and Tee were very similar to the offers that were reported before hand.
Trey also isn't as all around of an End as say Garrett or Crosby and doesn't play nearly as many snaps and he is older. It was reported 32 mil
per year was offered to Trey, if that is even close I think he should of taken it as it would be double what he is being paid now.
Just me, I would of taken double lol
