Yesterday, 04:46 PM
(Yesterday, 04:35 PM)J24 Wrote: Yeah I think 40 million a year is reasonable for him but I also think trading him is reasonable.
I dont want to be rude here, but you are flat out wrong. he is not worth $40 mill a year, nor is he worth as much as Garret. I get the #s, but if you simply watch them bith you will see that MG effects the game much much more than TH....same as Watt, he is better as well.
I am pissed at Trey for a few reasons, and dont think they should go crazy on and extension, but knowing the FO of the Bengals, i bet they are botching this badly. It sounds like they are forcing Trey and his team to go public and not communicating with him at all.
That is simply not a way to do business. You let Trey and his agent know where you are, what you are willing to do, and what you arent, but then you also be as transparent as possible with a guy who the city loves.
It just sounds like a nightmare, along with the Stewart situation, hard to imagine a worse offseason for a non playoff team.
