Why'd The Browns Take Two QBs?

[BFritz21]

(04-27-2025, 05:09 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: Seriously they still have no trade capital. Every team passed on Sanders multiple times and he’s still a better bet than Gabriel who is at best a career back up.  There are much better targets if you need a QB.  I don’t think anyone is going to go dumpster-diving into the Browns QB room if they need a QB.  If they do manage to trade one they would probably get a worse pick then what they used to get them.
I think ownership called the Sanders pick because the football people already made their choice for a QB.

Taking 2 back-up level QBs in the same draft was a very Browns thing to do.

What I'm wondering is who's going to ever want to trade for either of them?

This was a pretty terrible draft for quarterbacks and neither one is likely to do anything, especially when they're stealing each other's reps in practice and only one is likely to play per game on Sundays. What team is going to come calling with anything to make a trade worthwhile?