Why'd The Browns Take Two QBs?

[BFritz21]

(04-27-2025, 05:09 PM)Clark W Griswold Wrote: Seriously they still have no trade capital. Every team passed on Sanders multiple times and he’s still a better bet than Gabriel who is at best a career back up.  There are much better targets if you need a QB.  I don’t think anyone is going to go dumpster-diving into the Browns QB room if they need a QB.  If they do manage to trade one they would probably get a worse pick then what they used to get them.
I think ownership called the Sanders pick because the football people already made their choice for a QB.

Taking 2 back-up level QBs in the same draft was a very Browns thing to do.

That's what I'm saying! 

It's like every year they trade back to get more picks and build their draft capital, but they always seem to just keep building draft capital and not their team, or waste picks on players like Gabriel, Sanders, and throwback to Johnny Manzel!

(04-27-2025, 05:40 PM)HarleyDog Wrote: Browns are gonna Brown!

ALWAYS!

(04-27-2025, 05:45 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: IDK why the Browns took two QBs, neither of which are likely to end up as franchise players for any NFL team, but I'm glad that they did. I've resisted the urge for a day and a half now to call my son and say "I told you Sheduer Sanders would be a Brown". I'll just wait and slip that one in tomorrow, as he usually calls me on his ride home from work.  

I thought he for sure would but then I thought there was no way after they took Gabriel, but the Browns are the Browns!

I appreciate it because they make me realize that having a traumatic brain injury isn't so bad!