Day 2 NFL Draft!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Luvnit2]

(9 hours ago)ERIC1 Wrote: oh really..Stewart is questionable? do you know that if stewart had gotten 5-6 sacks he would have been drafted in the top 5..the guys disrupts almost every play and maybe did not get the sacks but had the opposing quarterback running for his life all the time..Knight is an ok linebacker?  reoprts I have read different from your assessment..Faitrchild is as solid as they come ..you give the draft a D because those chosen were not the players you wanted

We have many fans who have never studied tape or watched or studied players who feel they know it all and the FO is stupid. They rely on mock drafts and so called experts like Kiper (who liked our picks) who said Sanders was best QB in tne draft who is undrafted after round 3.

Experts are great, but once you get past the first 15 guys, even experts differ. The further the draft gets away from the top 15, the less consensus on the value (draft position of players) of draftees. Fans also never take into account if they want a guy at 49, it iis very unlikely regardless of ranking it will be there 32 to 40 picks later, so teams that drat a guy mid second round at 49 like we did take the guy because he will have to make it through midway of the 3rd round.

The board GMs are. too enamored in rankings by round. They love to use them when a guy appears to be picked early, but then ignore it when a player like Stewart who was a #1 on every board and in some cases top 10 DE they don't like is picked.

Every fan is entitled to their own opinion, it just seems some fans would not be happy regardless of who we pick as it was not their choice.