Today, 12:24 AM
(Today, 12:11 AM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Great read. Everyone needs to read it. It is not making excuses for him, it is teaching us his role which was play run first. A lot of college kids looking for a big pay day do their on thing and not what the team asked of them. It appears he did what was asked.
I loved this comment
You also can’t run away from him, he’s shown a relentlessly hot motor that causes him to run down plays from the backside, including screens where he has no reason to be involved in the play, but there he is blasting your receiver.
Yes, Shemar can blow up the run game and it leads to others making plays for him. Not a bad thing at all.
He needs to learn how to finish and so does Myles Murphy, Montgomery will have to be up to the task.
(Today, 12:12 AM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I think this is the classic draft your replacement a year before Bengals theory. I hope not as that has not proven to work out ever for us. I think we ask Trey to play out his last year and only sign him if Stewart does indeed look like a bust.
I don't know, hope not. We needed another disruptor on the DL and Stewart should be one whether we like the pick or not.
We gave Trey a 32 mil per year contract that he passed up, I think he would take it easily over just taking 16 mil like he is owed this year this
late in his career hoping for another big contract.
(Today, 12:13 AM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: Zabel. Campbell. Starks.
I think Jackson is at least a plus starter.
Zabel = small school same as Volson
Campbell = hurt to start the season even if I love the guy
Starks = might of been a bit of a reach at our pick but would of liked him for sure over Geno Stone
