Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Paul Daughtery: Doc: Zac Taylor came in strutting, without actually strutting. He was
#64
(05-04-2022, 05:57 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I am not trying to have anything "both ways".  I can't follow your logic here.

Marvin was an underdog in 5 of his 7 playoff games.  Zac was an underdog in 3 of his 4.  Not a lot of difference.  Zac won 3 of 4 and I have always given him more credit than Marvin.  So I have no clue what you are talking about.

All I did was correct someone who made a statement that was 100% false.  I don't understand why you guys get so upset at the truth. Why do you feel that you have to tell lies about Marvin in order to prop up Zac?  Why can't you acknowledge the huge change in the way the front office deals with free agency with Zac?

You do want it both ways. Marvin gets a pass for being underdog and losing Zac is an underdog and wins but the FO supports Taylor so although an underdog no credit. Too funny.

Where did I lie about Marvin?
Romo “ so impressed with Zac ...1 of the best in the NFL… they are just fundamentally sound. Taylor the best winning % in the Playoffs of current coaches. Joe Burrow” Zac is the best head coach in the NFL & that gives me a lot of confidence." Taylor led the Bengals to their first playoff win since 1990, ending the longest active drought in the four major North American sports, en and appeared in Super Bowl LVI, the first since 1988.

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]


Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Paul Daughtery: Doc: Zac Taylor came in strutting, without actually strutting. He was - Soonerpeace - 05-04-2022, 07:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)