![]() |
Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow (/thread-23932.html) |
RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - CJD - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 01:22 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Great post, that is the thing, why didn't Bama win the Joe Moore award? As you note, way better O-line that was great at Reading the evaluations of each of the finalists (of which Alabama is one), it looks like a huge portion of the evaluation is based on the offense's overall productivity. https://joemooreaward.com/press-release/2019/12/10/joe-moore-award-announces-2019-finalists LSU's section they basically don't mention the run game and focus entirely on total offense. Quote:LSU Tigers (13-0) Alabama's qualifications are slightly more attuned to the offensive line, discussing 5+ yard runs and sacks allowed, as well as general rushing efficiency. Quote:Alabama Crimson Tide (10-2) Oregon's and Ohio State's are much more focused on the run game, which I think most people would agree has a higher correlation to Oline success than the passing game (if the Oline can't open holes, the run game will go nowhere. A passing game can work around a poor Oline with quick passes and skill players making plays in space). Quote:Ohio State Buckeyes (13-0) Quote:Oregon Ducks (11-2) So, based on their qualifications, LSU would definitely win the award because they were the most productive offense overall in college football. Seems a little stilted, but hey, whatever. The award doesn't really mean that much in the long term (Read: in the NFL) anyway. The best players will get drafted the highest and will have the most success in the NFL, irrespective of which unit they played with in college. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 01:35 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: Reading the evaluations of each of the finalists (of which Alabama is one), it looks like a huge portion of the evaluation is based on the offense's overall productivity. Thought so, thanks CJD. Think they ought to take into account more of the blocking than the Offense as a whole myself. Funny how they leave out the sacks for LSU and mention them with Bama, sounds like Fred lol RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Bengalholic - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 11:26 AM)fredtoast Wrote: LSU had three O-linemen who were either first or second team All-SEC. Georgia only had two. ![]() https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/sp/overallol/2019 LSU was 64th in overall sack rate, 82nd in standard down sack rate, and 49th in passing down sack rate. Alabama ranked 5th, 33rd and 2nd. https://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/468/p2 LSU ranked 86th in sacks allowed per game and 29th in TFL allowed per game. Alabama ranked 3rd and 22nd. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Bengalholic - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 11:14 AM)bengalfan74 Wrote: Yep And consider what Joe did under pressure, which he was on a third of his passes. He had a higher QB rating under duress than 84 other QBs had with a clean pocket. That stat alone tells you that his ability to escape and create under pressure was able to mask a lot of the issues with that line in pass protection. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 02:53 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: And consider what Joe did under pressure, which was quite often. He had a higher QB rating under duress than 84 other QBs had with a clean pocket. That stat alone tells you that his ability to escape and create under pressure was able to mask a lot of the issues with that line in pass protection. No it doesn't. It is great that Burrow does well under pressure, but again you are comparing apples to oranges. If Burrow was under pressure more because he held onto the ball longer then it has nothing to do with the O-line. In fact it would make the o-line look worse instead of better. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 02:39 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Thank goodness they had guys like D-1 O-line coaches voting on this award. They are smart enough to realize that sack rates can be on the QB instead of the O-line. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 01:35 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: So, based on their qualifications, LSU would definitely win the award because they were the most productive offense overall in college football. (05-07-2020, 01:52 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Thought so, thanks CJD. Think they ought to take into account more of the blocking than the Offense as a whole myself. https://247sports.com/college/lsu/Article/College-Football-Joe-Moore-Award-LSU-OL-winner-2019-offensive-line-140841795/ “LSU showed a tone-setting attitude in both pass protection and in their run blocking that really caught the attention of the 200 plus member voting body that has collectively played and coached this position for well over 800 years.” “The O-line position is extremely difficult to evaluate, especially when doing so for entire units with different offenses and styles of play,” said Cole Cubelic, Chairman of the Joe Moore Award voting committee. “That’s why we thoroughly go through each of the finalists’ season-long highlight reels and multiple back-to-back quarters of game film. The focus on the film study is the only way the voting body can properly and credibly evaluate the nuances of the award criteria that would otherwise be difficult to see.” [b]What Voters Said[/b] "There is a tendency to hyper-focus on the rushing attacks and the run-blocking of these units, but LSU forced us to really alter our filters and do a deeper dive. They were solid against the run, but their ability to handle protection duties against SEC rushers with so many receivers out in routes was really impressive and one of the reasons QB Joe Burrow won the Heisman. It's not THE reason, but it's definitely one of them." "It's incredible how often and how well they pass block in "empty" protection (no TE or RB help). There are plays all season, including the SEC Championship game where they are blocking 6, 7, 8, 10 seconds while Burrow looks to throw downfield. Great awareness in pass pro and often look for work and pick up delayed rushers." "Passing as much as this offense did this year puts a unique strain on the group up front and boy did they respond. Sitting and watching these guys on film, the number of pass protection reps that I wrote down 'Teach Tape Worthy' next to in my notes was remarkable. Pass pro is definitely not passive for these guys." RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Bengalholic - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 03:03 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No it doesn't. Part of the reason Burrow had to hold the ball longer was because of all the pressure, forcing him to scramble and find a receiver while avoiding being sacked. Honest question...did you watch any LSU games this year? If you did, then you obviously saw what I'm talking about, and you saw it on a fairly regular basis...which is why I agreed completely with this PFF assessment: 'Burrow has not had an ideal scenario in regard to his pass-blocking unit – while it could be worse, it could certainly be better, as he has spent nearly 31% of his dropbacks under pressure.' RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - CJD - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 03:17 PM)fredtoast Wrote: https://247sports.com/college/lsu/Article/College-Football-Joe-Moore-Award-LSU-OL-winner-2019-offensive-line-140841795/ These things were also said, yes. But they listed the qualifications pretty clearly. You're very defensive of this award that LSU's offensive line got. No one is saying they're a bad Oline. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 03:44 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Part of the reason Burrow had to hold the ball longer was because of all the pressure, forcing him to scramble and find a receiver while avoiding being sacked. Re-read what you just wrote. It makes no sense at all. QB avoid the rush by getting rid of the ball quicker, not holding onto it longer. (05-07-2020, 03:44 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Honest question...did you watch any LSU games this year? If you did, then you obviously saw what I'm talking about, and you saw it on a fairly regular basis.. Yes. I am a huge SEC fan. I watched LSU games this year and I did not see what you saw. Neither did any of the current D-I O-line coaches, former players and coaches that voted for the Joe Moore Award. (05-07-2020, 03:44 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: .which is why I agreed completely with this PFF assessment: The draft was further proof that PFF is a joke. Where did their number one OT in both run blocking AND pass blocking get drafted? RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Bengalholic - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 04:06 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Re-read what you just wrote. It makes no sense at all. QB avoid the rush by getting rid of the ball quicker, not holding onto it longer. Joe was under pressure on 31% of all his dropbacks, but you didn't see it? ![]() RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - McC - 05-07-2020 Gee, another thread, like most all the rest, ends with Fred arguing alone with a dozen or two people, some of whom have provided clear and concise evidence of how wrong Fred is. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - GreenCornBengal - 05-07-2020 I'm sure someone already mentioned this in this thread but does it really even matter how great their O-line was? Joe Burrows efficiency increased when he was under pressure and had to scramble... So yes, his line was great, but even when they faltered, Joe did better. That's a testament to Joe independent of whatever line he has... right? Am I crazy on this one? RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - McC - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 05:21 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: I'm sure someone already mentioned this in this thread but does it really even matter how great their O-line was? Joe Burrows efficiency increased when he was under pressure and had to scramble...It's really simple to define the argument here. Fred is not a fan of Joe Burrow and there are no lengths to which he won't go to try to prove it, even though no such proof really exists. If Fred had his way, Marvin would still be the coach, AD still the QB, Paul Alexander the OLine coach and Nate Livings would be playing G. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 04:22 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: Joe was under pressure on 31% of all his dropbacks, but you didn't see it? I did not see it as a problem with the O-line. It had more to do with him holding onto the ball to long. I see you still don't understand this, since you have PFF go to their website and read the article posted there about how "QB pressures" are determined more by the QB than the O-line. If you can't find it I will post the link. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 05:21 PM)GreenCornBengal Wrote: Joe Burrows efficiency increased when he was under pressure and had to scramble... ![]() Link please? RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - fredtoast - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 05:25 PM)McC Wrote: It's really simple to define the argument here. Fred is not a fan of Joe Burrow and there are no lengths to which he won't go to try to prove it, even though no such proof really exists. Link to me saying one bad thing about Joe Burrow in this discussion. What is happening is that a cult is growing around Burrow. Even though a huge number of experts claim LSU had the best O-line in college football the apostles insist all of them, along with the people who voted on the All-SEC team, and all the NFL scouts were wrong and that Joe's O-line was not very good. For some strange reason only Bengal fans possess the ability to realize that it was all just Joe making them look better. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - CJD - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 04:06 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Re-read what you just wrote. It makes no sense at all. QB avoid the rush by getting rid of the ball quicker, not holding onto it longer. Just so we're clear, you don't understand how a play like this: would count as a longer drop back, despite being extreme pressure allowed by the Oline? RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - GreenCornBengal - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 06:11 PM)fredtoast Wrote: First link has passer efficiency for each college QB. Burrow at the top with 202.00 https://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/individual/8 Second link has a discussion on Burrow 'under pressure' and says the following. "When pressured, Burrow still completes 73.9 percent of his passes, a clip 9.5 percentage points better than any other player in the country and the top mark produced by any QB since at least 2011.4. He also has a 211.2 passer efficiency rating, the highest among qualified passers over that stretch, and has thrown 19 touchdowns, five clear of any other QB in a single season." https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-joe-burrow-the-most-efficient-college-qb-ever/ AKA, his passer efficiency rating is actually higher than his average when he is under pressure. I couldn't find the original video where I saw this, but they said he was the only QB who had a passer efficiency rating increase when under pressure, other QBs saw declines. I can't unfortunately find that video. RE: Where the Bengals Have Already Failed Joe Burrow - Bengalholic - 05-07-2020 (05-07-2020, 06:36 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: Just so we're clear, you don't understand how a play like this: Yeah, it's shouldn't be difficult to grasp the concept that the QB sometimes has to hold onto the ball longer due to nearly immediate pressure disrupting the play...forcing him to scramble, improvise and take longer to throw than planned. |