![]() |
Steelers vs Bengals - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Rival Talk (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Steelers vs Bengals (/thread-3885.html) |
RE: Steelers vs Bengals - rfaulk34 - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 12:18 PM)Wyche Wrote: Claussen gonna catch some of that Fightin' Leprechaun gold and bust that ass! May be Mallett by then. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - SteelCitySouth - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 02:17 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: With Andy...Different game. He didn't prove up till that point that it would have. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - 6andcounting - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 02:17 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: With Andy...Different game. If he didn't hurt himself on the first drive, one of those dirty Steelers would have got him out of there a drive or 2 later anyways. ![]() RE: Steelers vs Bengals - Wyche'sWarrior - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 03:04 PM)6andcounting Wrote: If he didn't hurt himself on the first drive, one of those dirty Steelers would have got him out of there a drive or 2 later anyways. .....minus, the ninja, this is something I can agree with. ![]() RE: Steelers vs Bengals - JS-Steelerfan - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 12:04 PM)yellowxdiscipline Wrote: There are currently two team that occupy Wild Card spots, you don't. A playoff isn't guaranteed, that's my point. (12-17-2015, 02:19 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Let me help you understand. I explained this in another thread, but I'll educate you here as well, since 6andcounting and SCS don't seem to be getting through to you. If all three teams win out, the Chiefs will have the 5th seed locked down because they already lead the most applicable tiebreaker - in-conference record. It is also true that the Jets currently have the advantage on the 6th seed tiebreaker. They have it because they currently have a better in-conference record than the Steelers, by a half game. However, the Steelers have one conference game in hand over the Jets because the Jets have one NFC game left on their schedule (the Steleers are done with the NFC). What this means is that if both teams win out, their respective conference records will be identical, which means we move to the NEXT tiebreaker. The next tiebreaker is record vs. common opponents. Despite what 6andcounting wrote earlier, it doesn't come into play unless conference records are identical, which they will be if they all win out. And if they all win out, Pittsburgh wins that one. Therefore, if all three teams win out, it will be the Chiefs and the Steelers getting in. The Steelers control their own destiny. Yellow is right, though - it's not guaranteed. But even if the Steelers lose to the Broncos, it's pretty likely that the Jets will also lose to the Patriots, keeping both teams even. The fact is that only SEEMS like the Steelers have more hurdles to climb than the actually do. It's actually more likely than not that they get in. THIS Steeler fan's logic: Reality = Reality. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - 6andcounting - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 07:00 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: I explained this in another thread, but I'll educate you here as well, since 6andcounting and SCS don't seem to be getting through to you.Steelers and jets will both win out and these guys will still shit themselves over the conspiracy that the NFL just chose the Steelers into the playoffs over the jets because the Goodell is a Steeler fan or something. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - JS-Steelerfan - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 08:07 PM)6andcounting Wrote: HSteelers and jets will both win out and these guys will still shit themselves over the conspiracy that the NFL just chose the Steelers into the playoffs over the jets because the Goodell is a Steeler fan or something. Well, Rooney and Goodell are chums, you know. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - rfaulk34 - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 02:52 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: He didn't prove up till that point that it would have. Driving right down to the 5 yd line on the first series... RE: Steelers vs Bengals - bengalhoel - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 11:23 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Well, Rooney and Goodell are chums, you know. Yeah in the same way that John Travolta and his massage boys are "chums" RE: Steelers vs Bengals - rfaulk34 - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 03:04 PM)6andcounting Wrote: If he didn't hurt himself on the first drive, one of those dirty Steelers would have got him out of there a drive or 2 later anyways. Tru! RE: Steelers vs Bengals - rfaulk34 - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 07:00 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: I explained this in another thread, but I'll educate you here as well, since 6andcounting and SCS don't seem to be getting through to you. This is where i stopped reading because i'm already aware of that. "playoff spot not guaranteed" is the part i was speaking to. Which is quite relevant when Steelers fans keep talking "if we win out...". RE: Steelers vs Bengals - Vlad - 12-18-2015 (12-17-2015, 11:38 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: This is where i stopped reading because i'm already aware of that. You should have kept reading. If we win out we are guaranteed a playoff spot. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - rfaulk34 - 12-18-2015 (12-18-2015, 12:46 AM)Vlad Wrote: You should have kept reading. IF RE: Steelers vs Bengals - GMDino - 12-18-2015 The only team that needs the Jets to lose a game...is the Bengals. Especically if the Bengals can't win with their back up QB. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25414477/heres-how-the-bengals-could-still-miss-the-playoffs Quote:Cincy is probably going to make the playoffs -- SportsLine's projections give them a 99.8 percent chance of getting in -- but they are not definitely going to make the playoffs. There's a Lloyd Christmas chance of them falling apart down the stretch. ![]() RE: Steelers vs Bengals - PhilHos - 12-18-2015 (12-16-2015, 09:36 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: please provide evidence of your assertion above. Hint, it does not exist. loser. Sure, it does. Right here: (12-16-2015, 09:36 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: Burfict's hit on Big Ben was dirty. ![]() RE: Steelers vs Bengals - Beaker - 12-18-2015 I can see Harbaugh tanking the Bengals game for two reasons: 1. Screwing over the steelers. 2. Getting a better draft pick. Those two incentives may be way more enticing than a division win in a lost season. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - JS-Steelerfan - 12-19-2015 (12-18-2015, 05:24 PM)Beaker Wrote: I can see Harbaugh tanking the Bengals game for two reasons: Why would you even bring this up? The Bengals would have to lose their next two for that game to be relevant. Are you that unsure of their chances in those games? RE: Steelers vs Bengals - Beaker - 12-20-2015 (12-19-2015, 03:26 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Why would you even bring this up? The Bengals would have to lose their next two for that game to be relevant. Are you that unsure of their chances in those games? In response to post 74 scenarios saying harbaugh will have his team amped up for a divisional game. RE: Steelers vs Bengals - SteelCitySouth - 12-20-2015 (12-18-2015, 01:09 PM)PhilHos Wrote: Sure, it does. Right here: hmmmmmm....something seems dirty here..... RE: Steelers vs Bengals - SteelCitySouth - 12-20-2015 (12-17-2015, 11:35 PM)rfaulk34 Wrote: Driving right down to the 5 yd line on the first series... awwwwww...that interception really stings you bad doesn't it? |