![]() |
Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson (/thread-31489.html) |
RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - casear2727 - 03-10-2022 (03-10-2022, 11:33 AM)Synric Wrote: Laremy Tunsil is not a free agent and will require alot of draft capital to acquire... hearing 2 1st round picks at least. I think we all know this... been talked about for a couple weeks now. The cost has varied from the #31 and maybe a later pick to two 1st rounders. The consensus is that two 1st rounders is too expensive but the other is doable... RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - jj22 - 03-13-2022 Chargers are favorite to land JC Jackson. RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - jj22 - 03-14-2022 Chargers bag JC. RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - Au165 - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 05:55 PM)jj22 Wrote: Chargers bag JC. He only went for 16.4 per, a little surprised and definitely not insanely out of our reach. RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - Ell Prez - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 06:02 PM)Au165 Wrote: He only went for 16.4 per, a little surprised and definitely not insanely out of our reach. Damn. I would have liked to have him and call it a Day. 16 isn’t bad for a turnover machine like him. RE: Bengals interested in J.C. Jackson - kalibengal - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 06:47 PM)Ell Prez Wrote: Damn. I would have liked to have him and call it a Day. 16 isn’t bad for a turnover machine like him. LA C not screwing around...JC and Mack in last few days..not bad Mack and Bosa with JC back there Herberts chances of going far just got way better |