![]() |
What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Printable Version +- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com) +-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html) +--- Thread: What Would Your Draft Have Been? (/thread-40479.html) |
RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Soonerpeace - 05-02-2025 (Yesterday, 01:39 PM)kevin Wrote: Lou was on the same page with Zac. Zac wanted Bengals D to have 5 to 6 DB's on the field 80 % of the game, and Lou did. However Golden who had one of the top coaching jobs in football at Notre Dame is not coming to Cincinnati to play that Zac and Lou defense. Golden has already said he will have 3 and 4 LB's on the field more. So instead of this Zac and Lou 5 to 6 DB's on the field 80 % of the game, Golden is going to have more 3 and 4 LB packages. Sometimes Golden will have the extra DB's on the field, but not 80 % of the game. Look for Golden to go back to more LB's in more of the game. Golden said he would. I think this was agreed on when Golden left the top coaching job at Notre Dame to come to Cincy, that he could run his defense, not the Zac and Lou all DB's all the time defense. Goldens’s family lives down the street from Zac and Sara. Never moved to South Bend. Zac was on the same page with his DC as he will be with his new DC. But Zac doesn’t do defense he leaves that up to them. Don’t get me wrong sure he’s the head coach but it was Lou’s defense as it will be Golden’s defense. The personnel and development was the big issue. RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - BengalYankee - 05-02-2025 The guy on the left. ![]() ![]() RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 05-02-2025 (Yesterday, 02:30 PM)ochocincos Wrote: I'll be interested to see how the 4 LBs would be used. Ossai really fits Al Golden's Defense. We sure won't be using all stack Backers in the 4 LB looks as Synric says. Have to have LB's that are good at multiple things and add different things to certain packages. Also, Stewart has the athleticism to drop back into coverage at times. I know Sam used to do this for us, but he was clearly slowing down the last 3 years or so and had the injury problems on top of it. I didn't like the Ends dropping into coverage because it didn't work, but with a heat seeking missile like Knight in there he could blitz while SS drops back and it could be scary for Offenses to deal with. RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Gdale_Bengal - 05-02-2025 The first 3 picks going Harmon Ratledge Fairchild Would have SIGNIFICANTLY helped this team. RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - SouthernFan - 05-02-2025 This is an impossible and pointless exercise. As soon a pick is changed, potentially every subsequent pick is impacted as a different pool of players would be available to each team. So outcomes are unknowable. RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 05-02-2025 (Yesterday, 02:26 PM)kevin Wrote: Not just 3 LB's. Golden is talking sometimes 4 LB's. Of course, Bengals didn't have enough Front 7, so in the Draft they added more Front 7. Golden says sometimes 4 LB's. This is going to be a whole new defense, and as bad as Bengals were on defense, I welcome the change. With Burrow, Chase and Higgins locked in, let's get back to The Super Bowl. The 4 LBs will almost certainly mean a 3 DT front with 4 DBs. He is trading a DL for a LB. But it certainly won't be 5 DBs with 4 LBs. Nor 5 DBs With 3 LBS. if we are legit gonna play 4 LBs, and Golden is not counting a DE amongst them (Ossai, Trey), then keeping Pratt is a real option. And we probably keep 6 LBs. 5 at least. Wilson, Knight, Burks, and Carrer are locks. Pratt is miles better than Heyward or Njongmeta. If we are not gonna use his cap savings on a FA (G, S, DT, CB, WR3, 2 way TE), and it sure looks like we are not gonna, then what is the point of cutting him? Rollover for 2026? RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Luvnit2 - 05-02-2025 Stewart - Best true DE in the draft Knight - 3rd best LB in the draft and other 2 taken Fairchild - I like him better than Rutledge and I got him a round later Carter - 4th best LB in the draft, a steal in round 4 Rivers - He will becoe a starter in next 3 years if he stays healthy Brooks - I had a 4th round grade and felt we needed a young back for the future It is also the only draft I will be able to honestly evalauate how these guys fit in our system and fit in Al's scheme which my hunch is going to be different from Lou's scheme. RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Luvnit2 - 05-02-2025 (Yesterday, 06:43 PM)Gdale_Bengal Wrote: The first 3 picks going I agree may have helped the offense assuming the 2 guards could start immediately and been good or better (not Volson good). But how did this help the defense? Harmon is DT #5 coming in on the depth chart. RE: What Would Your Draft Have Been? - Gdale_Bengal - 05-02-2025 (Yesterday, 07:47 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I agree may have helped the offense assuming the 2 guards could start immediately and been good or better (not Volson good). Harmon is already better than the majority of our DTs right now. He’s huge and long and will eat OL freeing up linebackers and give Hendrickson 1 on 1s. Out run defense will improve, and if he can, pressure up the middle with Hill will help DBs make plays from forcing the QB out of the pocket and uncomfortable. I dunno. I was really high on the guy. I hate that he is a steeler. |