+- Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise (https://thebengalsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Cincinnati Bengals / NFL (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: JUNGLE NOISE (https://thebengalsboard.com/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Interesting CB stat (/thread-17661.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Interesting CB stat - higgy100 - 10-19-2018
(10-18-2018, 06:14 PM)pally Wrote: Its Kirkpatrick's penalties that detract from his overall performance. For every great defense he gives one away.
More so, his inability to intercept balls..The guy has had just 4 picks in well over 3.5 years, covering 51 games he's played in. There's been plenty of chances to increase that total upwards to 8-9 but he can't hang onto the ball...
RE: Interesting CB stat - TheLeonardLeap - 10-19-2018
(10-19-2018, 12:00 PM)McC Wrote: Yes, but how much of that is to TE's and RB's? I would almost guess that TE's and backs have more catches against us than WR's.
Brown and Smith-Schuster both had 100+ yard games.
Jones and Sanu both had 100+ yard games. (Jones with 170+)
The Bengals actually surprisingly haven't played too many good WRs. I mean, the Ravens have John Brown (who was the Cardinals #3), the Panthers have Devin Funchess (who hasn't reached 2k yards in 3.5 years), I don't even think I know who the Dolphins #1 WR is.
Only good WR the Bengals have held in check is TY Hilton, and that was Luck's first game in over a year, so I don't know if that was more the Bengals D, or Luck's shoulder being rusty (he averaged well under 6 yards per attempt in his first three games).
TEs and RBs have been a problem, and might have more catches, but all the good WRs are still doing damage. Just don't think the Bengals have played too many yet.
RE: Interesting CB stat - McC - 10-19-2018
(10-19-2018, 01:03 PM)bengalfan74 Wrote: I would bet we'd rank high in YAC as well
No doubt.